<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Netroots Platform Unveiled! (Your group could be next)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mixedink.com/blog/2008/08/netroots-platform-unveiled-your-group-could-be-next/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mixedink.com/blog/2008/08/netroots-platform-unveiled-your-group-could-be-next/</link>
	<description>online collaboration, the startup process, company news &#38; other stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 11:16:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MixedInk Goes Public With Its Digg-Like Collaborative Document Creator &#171; ArticleSave</title>
		<link>http://mixedink.com/blog/2008/08/netroots-platform-unveiled-your-group-could-be-next/comment-page-1/#comment-8503</link>
		<dc:creator>MixedInk Goes Public With Its Digg-Like Collaborative Document Creator &#171; ArticleSave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 07:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mixedink.com/blog/?p=48#comment-8503</guid>
		<description>[...] MixedInk probably won&#8217;t be useful for small groups (it would probably be easier to pick up a phone), but for larger scale initiatives it could become a great alternative to traditional Wiki systems, which often use confusing versioning systems. The system has already been put to the test on some very large-scale documents: over the summer the technology was used by the Netroots community to write its platform. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MixedInk probably won&#8217;t be useful for small groups (it would probably be easier to pick up a phone), but for larger scale initiatives it could become a great alternative to traditional Wiki systems, which often use confusing versioning systems. The system has already been put to the test on some very large-scale documents: over the summer the technology was used by the Netroots community to write its platform. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MixedInk Goes Public With Its Digg-Like Collaborative Document Creator &#124; Fidicaro.net</title>
		<link>http://mixedink.com/blog/2008/08/netroots-platform-unveiled-your-group-could-be-next/comment-page-1/#comment-8502</link>
		<dc:creator>MixedInk Goes Public With Its Digg-Like Collaborative Document Creator &#124; Fidicaro.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mixedink.com/blog/?p=48#comment-8502</guid>
		<description>[...] MixedInk probably won’t be useful for small groups (it would probably be easier to pick up a phone), but for larger scale initiatives it could become a great alternative to traditional Wiki systems, which often use confusing versioning systems. The system has already been put to the test on some very large-scale documents: over the summer the technology was used by the Netroots community to write its platform. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MixedInk probably won’t be useful for small groups (it would probably be easier to pick up a phone), but for larger scale initiatives it could become a great alternative to traditional Wiki systems, which often use confusing versioning systems. The system has already been put to the test on some very large-scale documents: over the summer the technology was used by the Netroots community to write its platform. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Scripts Zone &#187; MixedInk Goes Public With Its Digg-Like Collaborative Document Creator</title>
		<link>http://mixedink.com/blog/2008/08/netroots-platform-unveiled-your-group-could-be-next/comment-page-1/#comment-8501</link>
		<dc:creator>The Scripts Zone &#187; MixedInk Goes Public With Its Digg-Like Collaborative Document Creator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mixedink.com/blog/?p=48#comment-8501</guid>
		<description>[...] MixedInk probably won&#8217;t be useful for small groups (it would probably be easier to pick up a phone), but for larger scale initiatives it could become a great alternative to traditional Wiki systems, which often use confusing versioning systems. The system has already been put to the test on some very large-scale documents: over the summer the technology was used by the Netroots community to write its platform. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MixedInk probably won&#8217;t be useful for small groups (it would probably be easier to pick up a phone), but for larger scale initiatives it could become a great alternative to traditional Wiki systems, which often use confusing versioning systems. The system has already been put to the test on some very large-scale documents: over the summer the technology was used by the Netroots community to write its platform. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diggふうのコラボワークでドキュメントを作るMixedInkが一般公開</title>
		<link>http://mixedink.com/blog/2008/08/netroots-platform-unveiled-your-group-could-be-next/comment-page-1/#comment-8500</link>
		<dc:creator>Diggふうのコラボワークでドキュメントを作るMixedInkが一般公開</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 10:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mixedink.com/blog/?p=48#comment-8500</guid>
		<description>[...] MixedInkはたぶん小グループには向いていない（電話で打ち合わせをしたほうが速いだろう）。でも大規模なプロジェクトでは、バージョン管理が複雑難解になりがちな従来のWikiシステムより便利かもしれない。このシステムはすでに、一部のとても大きなドキュメントでテストされている：この夏、この技術をNetrootsのコミュニティが使って、そのプラットホームを書いた。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MixedInkはたぶん小グループには向いていない（電話で打ち合わせをしたほうが速いだろう）。でも大規模なプロジェクトでは、バージョン管理が複雑難解になりがちな従来のWikiシステムより便利かもしれない。このシステムはすでに、一部のとても大きなドキュメントでテストされている：この夏、この技術をNetrootsのコミュニティが使って、そのプラットホームを書いた。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Desperate Wealth &#187; Blog Archive &#187; MixedInk Goes Public With Its Digg-Like Collaborative Document Creator</title>
		<link>http://mixedink.com/blog/2008/08/netroots-platform-unveiled-your-group-could-be-next/comment-page-1/#comment-8499</link>
		<dc:creator>Desperate Wealth &#187; Blog Archive &#187; MixedInk Goes Public With Its Digg-Like Collaborative Document Creator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mixedink.com/blog/?p=48#comment-8499</guid>
		<description>[...] MixedInk probably won&#8217;t be useful for small groups (it would probably be easier to pick up a phone), but for larger scale initiatives it could become a great alternative to traditional Wiki systems, which often use confusing versioning systems. The system has already been put to the test on some very large-scale documents: over the summer the technology was used by the Netroots community to write its platform. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MixedInk probably won&#8217;t be useful for small groups (it would probably be easier to pick up a phone), but for larger scale initiatives it could become a great alternative to traditional Wiki systems, which often use confusing versioning systems. The system has already been put to the test on some very large-scale documents: over the summer the technology was used by the Netroots community to write its platform. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MixedInk Goes Public With Its Digg-Like Collaborative Document Creator</title>
		<link>http://mixedink.com/blog/2008/08/netroots-platform-unveiled-your-group-could-be-next/comment-page-1/#comment-8498</link>
		<dc:creator>MixedInk Goes Public With Its Digg-Like Collaborative Document Creator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mixedink.com/blog/?p=48#comment-8498</guid>
		<description>[...] MixedInk probably won&#8217;t be useful for small groups (it would probably be easier to pick up a phone), but for larger scale initiatives it could become a great alternative to traditional Wiki systems, which often use confusing versioning systems. The system has already been put to the test on some very large-scale documents: over the summer the technology was used by the Netroots community to write its platform. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MixedInk probably won&#8217;t be useful for small groups (it would probably be easier to pick up a phone), but for larger scale initiatives it could become a great alternative to traditional Wiki systems, which often use confusing versioning systems. The system has already been put to the test on some very large-scale documents: over the summer the technology was used by the Netroots community to write its platform. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liminal states &#187; No blank check for Wall Street: an open letter to the Presidential candidates (DRAFT)</title>
		<link>http://mixedink.com/blog/2008/08/netroots-platform-unveiled-your-group-could-be-next/comment-page-1/#comment-6445</link>
		<dc:creator>Liminal states &#187; No blank check for Wall Street: an open letter to the Presidential candidates (DRAFT)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mixedink.com/blog/?p=48#comment-6445</guid>
		<description>[...] or not you&#8217;ve ever been involved in a collaborative writing project like MixedInk&#8217;s Netroots Platform before, it&#8217;s a great opportunity to try it out.  I&#8217;m sure the general topic of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] or not you&#8217;ve ever been involved in a collaborative writing project like MixedInk&#8217;s Netroots Platform before, it&#8217;s a great opportunity to try it out.  I&#8217;m sure the general topic of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://mixedink.com/blog/2008/08/netroots-platform-unveiled-your-group-could-be-next/comment-page-1/#comment-6709</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 14:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mixedink.com/blog/?p=48#comment-6709</guid>
		<description>Ben, there&#039;s no separate forum, user profiles, or messaging - yet.  That will come later.  (Which reminds me we should probably add &quot;beta&quot; to our logo.)

From your years of activism you know that new projects should start with specific, attainable goals and grow and expand as circumstances allow.  In the meantime, we appreciate your feedback and patience!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben, there&#8217;s no separate forum, user profiles, or messaging &#8211; yet.  That will come later.  (Which reminds me we should probably add &#8220;beta&#8221; to our logo.)</p>
<p>From your years of activism you know that new projects should start with specific, attainable goals and grow and expand as circumstances allow.  In the meantime, we appreciate your feedback and patience!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Tremblay</title>
		<link>http://mixedink.com/blog/2008/08/netroots-platform-unveiled-your-group-could-be-next/comment-page-1/#comment-3904</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 22:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mixedink.com/blog/?p=48#comment-3904</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand.
Foundationally the project builds on the philosophy of social software, yes?
But I couldn&#039;t find anything like a forum ... I couldn&#039;t find anything like user profiles or any form of messaging ... nothing like discussion of platform items here ... heck, you haven&#039;t even posted that the platform was complete!

I know critique is sufficient grounds for accusations of dis-loyalty and just plain bad attititude ... I&#039;ve been a street-level activist since &#039;73 and a web activist since &#039;95, I&#039;ve seen personality politics at work ... but how is it that such a fine slab of programming is ham strung in this way? (&lt;i&gt;&quot;&lt;b&gt;Ham strung&lt;/b&gt;&quot; ... to cripple an animal or an enemy by cutting the ham strings, the huge tendons that run from the knee up into the thigh.&lt;/i&gt;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand.<br />
Foundationally the project builds on the philosophy of social software, yes?<br />
But I couldn&#8217;t find anything like a forum &#8230; I couldn&#8217;t find anything like user profiles or any form of messaging &#8230; nothing like discussion of platform items here &#8230; heck, you haven&#8217;t even posted that the platform was complete!</p>
<p>I know critique is sufficient grounds for accusations of dis-loyalty and just plain bad attititude &#8230; I&#8217;ve been a street-level activist since &#8216;73 and a web activist since &#8216;95, I&#8217;ve seen personality politics at work &#8230; but how is it that such a fine slab of programming is ham strung in this way? (<i>&#8220;<b>Ham strung</b>&#8221; &#8230; to cripple an animal or an enemy by cutting the ham strings, the huge tendons that run from the knee up into the thigh.</i>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
