<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 ways to improve on wikis (even though we love them)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mixedink.com/blog/2007/06/5-ways-to-improve-on-wikis-even-though-we-love-them/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mixedink.com/blog/2007/06/5-ways-to-improve-on-wikis-even-though-we-love-them/</link>
	<description>online collaboration, the startup process, company news &#38; other stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 18:43:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://mixedink.com/blog/2007/06/5-ways-to-improve-on-wikis-even-though-we-love-them/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 18:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mixedink.com/blog/?p=6#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Webster,

I agree that vandalism can be a problem, but Wikipedia seems to have solved it by having committed, passionate users who act as watchdogs, and by &#039;locking&#039; popular articles for editing only by trusted users. The LA Times didn&#039;t institute the types of controls they should have given that they lacked the organic community of watchdogs.  And they don&#039;t have the institutional flexibility to deal with having inappropriate material on their site, however briefly, given their high profile.

We just hope and pray their failure doesn&#039;t doom collaborative opinion expression for all time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Webster,</p>
<p>I agree that vandalism can be a problem, but Wikipedia seems to have solved it by having committed, passionate users who act as watchdogs, and by &#8216;locking&#8217; popular articles for editing only by trusted users. The LA Times didn&#8217;t institute the types of controls they should have given that they lacked the organic community of watchdogs.  And they don&#8217;t have the institutional flexibility to deal with having inappropriate material on their site, however briefly, given their high profile.</p>
<p>We just hope and pray their failure doesn&#8217;t doom collaborative opinion expression for all time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webster</title>
		<link>http://mixedink.com/blog/2007/06/5-ways-to-improve-on-wikis-even-though-we-love-them/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>webster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mixedink.com/blog/?p=6#comment-4</guid>
		<description>As an avid wikimedia user (http://wikimedia.org), I have to say that the wiki has changed the way my company operates internally.  But you&#039;re right that there are some things that could be improved.  I assume you know about the LA Times wikitorial experiment, which ended in disaster when readers started posting porn: http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editorials/la-wiki-splash,0,1349109.story -- vandalism can clearly be a big problem for wikis when open to the public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an avid wikimedia user (<a href="http://wikimedia.org)" rel="nofollow">http://wikimedia.org)</a>, I have to say that the wiki has changed the way my company operates internally.  But you&#8217;re right that there are some things that could be improved.  I assume you know about the LA Times wikitorial experiment, which ended in disaster when readers started posting porn: <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editorials/la-wiki-splash,0,1349109.story" rel="nofollow">http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editorials/la-wiki-splash,0,1349109.story</a> &#8212; vandalism can clearly be a big problem for wikis when open to the public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

